Court returns Roger Brown as Saplat CEO, vacates restraining order
(Nigeria) A Federal High Court, sitting in Lagos on Thursday vacated the interim ex-parte orders previously made by the court, restraining the Chief Executive Officer of Seplat Energy Plc, Mr. Roger Brown, from participating in the management of the company.
Trial judge, Justice Aneke vacated the order while ruling on applications filed by the Respondents, namely Seplat Energy Plc, Mr. Roger Thompson Brown, Mr. Basil Omiyi, and Persons affected by the ex parte orders in Suit No. FHC/L/402/2023.
The court held that by virtue of Order 26 Rules 9
and 10 of the of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2019,
the interim orders of the court made on 8th March 2023 are hereby
discharged and vacated.
The court also refused the request of
counsel to the petitioners to move his application for
joinder.
Justice Aneke held that the business of the day was for
ruling on application to set aside the ex-parte orders made on 8th of
March 2023.
The court noted that since counsel to all the
Respondents are opposed to hearing of the application, his request
cannot be accommodated.
The court had on March 8, 2023,
restrained Mr. Brown from parading himself as the CEO of the company
pending the determination of the suit instituted against him by some
aggrieved stakeholders of the company over allegations of racism,
favouring of expatriate workers, discrimination against Nigerians,
and breach of good governance.
Justice Aneke made the orders while
ruling on a Motion Ex-parte, filed by J C Njikonye, on behalf of some
aggrieved stakeholders of Seplat – Moses Igbrude, Sarat Kudaisi,
Kenneth Nnabike, Ajani Abidoye, and Robert Ibekwe, against the
Respondents, Seplat Energy PLC, Mr. Roger Thompson Brown, and Mr.
Basil Omiyi, in Suit No. FHC/L/402/2023.
However the Respondents
in their various applications urged the court to set aside the
ex-parte orders, contending that the Petitioners lacked locus standi
to file the suit.
They also challenged the jurisdiction of the
court to entertain the suit on grounds that the complaints of the
Petitioners fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the National
Industrial Court.
Besides, they contended that the interim orders
were granted against persons that were not parties to the suit, and
that the Petitioners lacked locus standi to file the suit.
The
Respondents argued that those persons who were not parties to the
suit at the time the interim orders were granted have come to ask the
Court to set aside the interim orders.
Besides, they stated that
the Petitioners having seeing that the interim orders ought not have
been sought and obtained against these persons, they (Petitioners)
have now brought an application for joinder saying those persons are
necessary parties
“Despite being aware that those persons
against whom the interim order were made in their absence are
necessary parties, the Petitioners did not make these persons
Respondents in the suit, obtained orders against them in their
absence, knowing that they were necessary parties, and has now filed
the Joinder Application after obtaining the interim
orders.
Specifically, counsel to Seplat, Mr. Bode Olanipekun, SAN,
submitted that the interim orders of the court had elapsed by the
passage of time and if the Counsel to the Petitioners/Respondents
concedes that the interim orders had expired and needs the formal
orders of the court to be set aside, the coast would be clear for him
to make any further application.
In his ruling, Justice Aneke,
noted that the Petitioners had in their application alleged that the
affairs of Seplat was been conducted in a manner that is illegal,
oppressive and unfairly prejudicial to their interests
The Judge
held, “I find as a fact that the Petitioners’ grouse can
adequately be accommodated under the provisions of Section 354 of the
Companies and Allied Matters Act, CAMA which falls within the
jurisdiction of this court.
“I find and hold that the
Petitioners have lucus standi to bring the petition before the Court.
Furthermore, this court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the suit as
it falls within the provision of section 251 of the Constitution.
However, by virtue of Order 26 Rules 9 and 10 of the of the Federal
High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2019, the interim orders of the
court made on March 8, 2023, are hereby discharged and
vacated”.
Justice Aneke has adjourned the matter till May 16,
for accelerated hearing.
Comments
Post a Comment