Alleged N304.1m fraud: Court admits more evidence against Ex-NIMASA DG, 2 others
*Federal High Court sitting in Lagos
(Nigeria) A senior investigating officer with Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, EFCC, Mr. Orji Chukwuma, has narrated to a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, on Tuesday, how a former acting Director-General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration
and Safety Agency, NIMASA, Haruna Jauro, and two others laundered various sums
of funds allegedly belonging to NIMASA.
Trial judge in the matter is Justice Tijjani Ringim.
Jauro alongside Dr. Dauda Bawa and a
company, Thlumbau Enterprises Limited, is being prosecuted on a 19-count charge of stealing and money laundering to the tune of N304,118, 500.
At the resumed hearing on Tuesday the
prosecution presented its third prosecution witness, PW3, Orji Chukwuma who
investigated the alleged crime.
Led in evidence by the prosecution counsel,
Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, Chukwuma, of the Chairman Monitoring Unit, EFCC, Abuja,
told the court that he was Head, Special Task Force Unit 3, Lagos Zonal Command,
at the time of the investigation of the alleged fraud.
When asked if he knew the defendants and
the company, Thlumbau Enterprises Limited, the PW3, whose team was tasked with
investigating money laundering and other financial crimes, stated that he came
across all the defendants in the course of his investigation, upon receipt of
intelligence reports against the management of NIMASA.
According to him, in the course of
investigations, various enquiries were made to banks and staff of NIMASA and
that interviews were also conducted on staff, banks’ employees, contractors to
NIMASA, corporate organisations, individuals who made payments into the 3rd and 1st
defendants’ accounts as well as some beneficiaries of the proceeds made by them. Investigations revealed
that the 3rd defendant was incorporated by the 1st defendant, using his children, while the 2nd
defendant operated the account of the 3rd defendant.
“Further investigation revealed that
proceeds of unlawful activities of the 1st defendant, while he was the
Executive Director of Finance and Administration in NIMASA, was concealed and
laundered for his benefit through the 3rd defendant. The proceeds was used to
acquire a property in Abuja,” he said.
In his further testimony, Chukwuma told the
court that funds co-mingled with loans taken from Aso Savings Limited to also
acquire two other houses in Lagos.
Asked if he could identify both Exhibits AI
and A2, which are the 3rd defendant’s statement of account containing the
proceeds of the enquiries and investigations he carried out, the PW3 identified exhibit A series as the 3rd
defendant’s mandate and statement of accounts, responses to the EFCC’s enquires
as well as the instruments used to move money out of the 3rd defendant’s
account.
Giving evidence about Exhibit A1 and the
share structures of the 3rd defendant, the PW3 told the court that one Samuel Baba
had 500,000 ordinary units; one Salome Baba owned 250,000, ordinary
shares and one Ila Haruna owned 200,000, ordinary
shares.
He also stated that the names mentioned are
children and relations of the 1st defendant and that their addresses are the
same as his.
When asked if he could identify the
enquiries he recovered while conducting investigations in NIMASA, the PW3 did,
adding that they were documents from NIMASA to banks to effect payments.
The prosecution sought to tender a copy of
the internal memo of NIMASA dated July 8, 2014, and two letters of
instructions to Access Bank from NIMASA dated January 3, 2014.
They were all admitted and marked as
exhibits B, B1 and B2 by the court.
During the proceedings, the prosecution
counsel also asked the witness if there was an exchange of correspondence
regarding the Aso Savings loans he
earlier talked about, to which he answered in the affirmative, adding that it
contained the mandate , statement of account, certificate of identification and
mortgage correspondence of the first defendant.
The prosecution counsel also sought to
tender the letter dated February 10, 2016, from Aso Savings and Loans Plc to the EFCC
with its attachments, and they were all admitted in evidence and marked as
exhibit C.
While giving further testimony about
exhibit A and some etries made on January 6, ,2014, Chukwuma explained that there was an inflow of N15million, that came
from the Committee of Intelligence belonging to NIMASA.
He said: “The Committee is set up and
funded by NIMASA for specific purposes related to security.
“Investigations showed, from the account
statement of January 23, 2014, that the sum of N12million out of the N15million was transferred
to the account of the first defendant in Aso Savings to manage the loans he
took to buy property.
“On July 10, 2014, another sum of N20million, was
also paid into the account of the third defendant.
“Subsequently, the 2nd defendant also
benefited the sum ofN1. 47million, which was later returned to the Commission in a draft.”
When he was shown copies of the draft by
the prosecution counsel, he identified them as the statement of one Ishaq
Banabas, who returned the total sum of N35million, through five
different bank drafts to the EFCC Draft Registration Form Receipt.
The drafts as well as the EFCC
Draft Registration Form receipt were
admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits D and D1, respectively. The PW3, in
his further testimony, told the court that the sum of N20million, was
transferred by Kishini Nigeria Limited and another N5million, was paid into
the third defendant by Eminent Consult.
The 3rd defendant’s account, according to
him, was co-mingled and aggregated to the sum of N52million, paid to one
Helen Mbonu , who used it to purchase a house for the first defendant. When
asked about the various entries in the
exhibit A series, the PW3 told the Court that there were several inflows from various individuals and companies into the 3rd defendant’s accounts,
including Sulaiman Mohammed, Komas Mega BDC, Dan Asabe, Mustapha Buka, Dulbangon Enterprise, Kostam Mega Concept, Kolomi Mohammed, Abubakar
Mansur, Mukaila Jubrila, Alkawali Nigerian Enterprise and Hassan.
Asked if the third defendant rendered any
services that led to the various cash payments totaling N120million, the
witness told the court that the 3rd defendant never rendered any services,
adding that “the payments are proceeds of unlawful activities.”
The case was adjourned till March 15, 2023, for
continuation of trial.
Comments
Post a Comment