SERAP writes Buhari, seeks ‘copy of agreement with Twitter’
SERAP also urged him to “direct Alhaji Lai Mohammed to
clarify the manner and scope in which the agreement with Twitter will be
enforced, including whether the agreement incorporates respect for human
rights, consistent with the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and
international obligations.”
In the letter dated January 15, 2022, by SERAP deputy
director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the
organisation said: “Publishing the agreement would enable Nigerians to
scrutinize it, seek legal remedies as appropriate, and ensure that the
conditions for lifting the suspension of Twitter are not used as pretexts to
suppress legitimate discourse.”
SERAP said: “Publishing the agreement with Twitter would
also promote transparency, accountability, and help to mitigate threats to
Nigerians’ rights online, as well as any interference with online privacy in
ways that deter the exercise of freedom of opinion and expression.”
According to SERAP, “Nigerians are entitled to their
constitutionally and internationally recognized human rights, such as the
rights to freedom of expression, access to information, privacy, peaceful
assembly and association, as well as public participation both offline and
online.”
The letter, read in part: “Any agreement with social media
companies must meet constitutional and international requirements, including
legality, necessity, proportionality and legitimacy.
“This means that any conditions for lifting the suspension
of Twitter must meet the requirements of regular legal processes and limit
government discretion. Secretly agreed conditions will fail these fundamental
requirements.
“The government has a duty to demonstrate that the conditions
for lifting the suspension of Twitter would not threaten or violate the
enjoyment of Nigerians’ human rights online, and that the conditions are in
pursuit of a legitimate goal in a democratic society.
“SERAP is concerned that the operation and enforcement of
the agreement may be based on broadly worded restrictive laws, which may be
used as pretexts to suppress legitimate discourse, interfere with online
privacy, and deter the exercise of freedom of opinion and expression.
“For example, the statement by the government announcing the
lifting of the suspension of Twitter used overly broad terms and phrases like
‘prohibited publication’, ‘Nigerian laws’, ‘national culture and history’.
These open-ended terms and phrases may be used to suppress legitimate exercise
of human rights online.
“Any agreement with social media companies must not be used
as a ploy to tighten governmental control over access to the internet, monitor
internet activity, or to increase online censorship and the capacity of the
government to restrict legitimate online content, contrary to standards on
freedom of expression and privacy.
“SERAP notes the interdependence of human rights, such as
the importance of privacy as a gateway to freedom of expression.
“Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution, article 9 of the
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and article 19 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantee the right to
hold opinions without interference, and the right to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers and through any
medium.
“The Nigerian Constitution and human rights treaties impose
duties on your government to ensure enabling environments for freedom of
expression, privacy rights and other human rights, and to protect their
exercise.
“While human rights law requires States to prohibit
‘advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement
to discrimination, hostility or violence’, States must still satisfy the
cumulative conditions of legality, necessity, proportionality and legitimacy in
any agreement with social media companies.
“Your government has a legal obligation to promote universal
Internet access, media diversity and independence, as well as ensure that any
agreements with Twitter and other social media companies are not used to
impermissibly restrict these fundamental human rights.
“By the combined reading of the provisions of the
Constitution of Nigeria, the Freedom of Information Act 2011, and human rights
treaties to which Nigeria is a state party, there are transparency obligations
imposed on your government to widely publish the agreement and details of the
conditions upon which the suspension of Twitter was lifted.
“It is stated in the statement by the Federal Government
that Twitter has reached an agreement with the government ‘to manage prohibited
publication in line with Nigerian laws.’ We would be grateful for
clarifications on the definition of ‘prohibited information,’ and the specific
applicable Nigerian laws in the context of the agreement.
“It is also stated in the statement by the Federal
Government that Twitter has agreed to ‘act with a respectful acknowledgement of
Nigerian laws and the national culture and history on which such legislation
has been built.’ We would be grateful for clarifications on the specific and
applicable Nigerian laws, national culture and history upon which the operation
and enforcement of the agreement will be based.
“We would be grateful if the requested information and
details are provided to us within seven days of the receipt and/or publication
of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all
appropriate legal action in the public interest to compel your government to
comply with our request.
“According to our information, the approval was given to
lift the suspension of Twitter operation in Nigeria effective from January 13,
2022, 12a.m., following the memo sent to you by the Minister of Communications
and Digital Economy, Prof Isa Ali Ibrahim. The decision to lift the suspension
was reportedly based on the recommendations by the Technical Committee on
Nigeria-Twitter Engagement.
“SERAP notes that Alhaji Lai Mohammed on June 5, 2021,
announced the suspension of operation of Twitter by the Federal Government,
following which a seven-man Presidential Committee was set up to engage Twitter
Inc. The Presidential Committee in turn established a 20-member Technical
Committee, which reportedly directly worked with the Twitter team.”
The letter was copied to Alhaji Lai Mohammed and Mr Abubakar
Malami, SAN, Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice.
Comments
Post a Comment