SERAP seeks details of payment of N729bn to poor Nigerians, sues FG
(Nigeria) Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, has
filed a lawsuit asking the Federal High Court in Lagos “to compel the Federal
Government to disclose details of proposed payments of N729billion to 24.3
million poor Nigerians, including the mechanisms and logistics for the
payments, list of beneficiaries, and how they have been selected, and whether
the payments will be made in cash or through Bank Verification Numbers or other
means.”
SERAP is also seeking “an order directing and compelling the
Federal Government to explain the rationale for paying N5,000 to 24.3 million
poor Nigerians for six months, which translates to five-percent of the
country’s budget of N13.6 trillion for 2021.”
The suit followed SERAP’s Freedom of Information, FoI,
request to Ms Sadia Umar-Farouk, Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Disasters
Management and Social Development, stating that: “Disclosing the details of
beneficiaries and selection criteria, as well as the payment plan would promote
transparency and accountability, and remove the risks of mismanagement and
diversion of public funds.”
In the suit number FHC/L/CS/853/2021 filed at the Federal
High Court, Lagos, SERAP is also seeking: “an order directing and compelling
the Federal Government to clarify whether the proposed payment to poor
Nigerians is part of the N5.6 trillion budget deficit.”
In the suit against Ms Sadia Umar-Farouk, SERAP is arguing
that “Providing support and assistance to poor Nigerians is a human rights
obligation but the programme to spend five-percent of the 2021 budget, which is
mostly based on deficit and borrowing, requires anti-corruption safeguards to
ensure the payments go directly to the intended beneficiaries, and that public
funds are not mismanaged or diverted.”
According to SERAP: “The Nigerian Constitution of 1999 [as
amended], UN Convention against Corruption, and African Union Convention on
Preventing and Combating Corruption to which Nigeria is a state party require
the government to set the highest standards of transparency, accountability and
probity in programmes that it oversees.”
SERAP is also arguing that “The government has a
responsibility to ensure that these requirements and other anti-corruption
controls are fully implemented and monitored, and that the payments are
justified in light of the huge budget deficit and borrowing, and whether there
are better ways to spend N729bn to support poor Nigerians.”
According to SERAP: “The Federal Government has repeatedly
failed to ensure transparency and accountability in the spending of public
wealth and resources.”
The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare and Opeyemi Owolabi, read
in part: “Transparency and accountability in the programme would improve public
trust, and allow Nigerians to track and monitor its implementation, and to
assess if the programme is justified, as well as to hold authorities to account
in cases of diversion, mismanagement and corruption.
“Obedience to the rule of law by all citizens but more
particularly those who publicly took oath of office to protect and preserve the
constitution is a desideratum to good governance and respect for the rule of
law. In a democratic society, this is meant to be a norm; it is an apostasy for
government to ignore the provisions of the law and the necessary rules to
regulate matters.
“The right to truth allows Nigerians to gain access to
information essential to the fight against corruption. This is in line with the
Government’s anti-corruption strategy of citizen involvement in the fight
against corruption. As a positive development strategy, access to information
will foster development of democratic institutions in Nigeria.
“Democracy cannot flourish in the absence of citizen’s
access to information. Public officers are mere custodians of public records.
The citizenry is entitled to know how the common wealth is being utilized,
managed and administered. This right to know will no doubt help in promoting a
transparent democracy, good governance and public accountability.”
No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.
Comments
Post a Comment