Court admits N24bn Police Pension fraud suspect’s statements
(Nigeria) The trial-within-trial of Veronica Onyegbula, who
is standing trial along with a former director at the Police Pension Office,
Esai Dangabar, for an alleged N24 billion pension fraud, continued on June 20,
2018 with the court dismissing the objection against the admissibility of her
statements made to the EFCC.
E.C. Ikeji, counsel for Onyegbula, had objected to the
application of the prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, to tender her
statements dated February 13, 15, and 17, 2012, and May 2, 2102.
Onyegbula, a former cashier in the Police Pension Office,
testifying as the first defence witness, had in the course of the trial
challenged the admissibility of the statements, thus necessitating the need for
the trial-within-trial.
Ikeji had argued that the statements were made
“involuntarily” by the witness, and so could not be tendered in court.
Jacobs, however, countered Ikeji’s argument, citing Section
104 of the Evidence Act.
He said: “My lord, recall that the trial-within-trial is a
separate trial and I need to tender the documents for the purpose of the
trial-within- trial because that is the subject matter of the
trial-within-trial. We must prove whether the document which is the statement
was taken voluntarily or not.
“My learned colleague can only argue on the procedure that
the statements were taken and not the statements themselves. There is a need to
look critically at the content of the documents in a bid to determine the
voluntariness.”
After listening to the arguments, the trial judge, went
through the statements in contention and admitted them as Exhibits D1 to D5,
respectively.
The case has been adjourned to October 9, 2018.
It will be recalled that Dangabar and Onyegbula are standing
trial along with Atiku Abubakar Kigo, Ahmed Inuwa Wada, Sani Habila Zira, Uzoma
Cyril Attang and Christian Madubuke.
Comments
Post a Comment