Bonga oil spill: Court orders Shell to pay $3.6b fine
(Nigeria) A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has
dismissed a suit by Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd challenging
the imposing of $3.6billion fine on it by the Federal Government.
Trial judge, Justice Mojisola Olatoregun resolved all the
issues in the defendant’s favour and dismissed the suit.
Shell sued the National Oil Spill Detection and Response
Agency, NOSDRA, challenging its powers to impose levies or fines over oil
spills.
The plaintiff prayed the court to declare that NOSDRA
cannot, in the light of Section 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the 1999 Constitution,
validly exercise any powers under Section 5, 6, 7 and 19 of the NOSDRA Act.
Shell, through its lawyer Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, said
the sections’ provisions encroach on judicial powers vested exclusively in the
courts.
The oil giant argued that it is the Federal High Court that
is vested with the jurisdiction to determine liability and to assess, impose
and direct the payment of any sum as penalty, damages or compensation in
connection with an incidence of oil spillage, particularly the Bonga Oil Spill
of December 20, 2011.
Shell urged the court to declare that the decision leading
to the imposition of $3,600,191,206.00 on by NOSDRA was in breach of its right
as enshrined in Section 36, 43 and 44 of the 1999 Constitution.
It also urged the court to nullify NOSDRA’s powers to impose
such levies over oil spills.
But NOSDRA, through its counsel Mr D. A. Awosika, argued
that the cause of action arose on March 25, 2015 when it served Shell with
notice of sanction over the Bonga Oil Spill.
Awosika contended that Shell was enjoined to exercise its
right of litigation if it felt aggrieved by the letters within three months
from March 25, 2015 and not beyond.
“The plaintiff waited for more than 13 months to institute
this action against the defendant,” NOSDRA said, adding that Shell’s action was
caught by the statute of limitation.
Besides, NOSDRA said it did not act outside its powers in
imposing the fine on Shell.
In her May 24 judgment, a copy of which was obtained on
Wednesday, Justice Olatoregun held that NOSDRA acted in line with its powers
and did not violate Shell’s rights in any manner.
The judge also found that Sections 5, 6 and 7 of the NOSDRA
Act which empower it to impose penalties do not violate the Constitution.
“I found no conflict with the duties conferred on NOSDRA by
law and the power of the court to adjudicate in this matter…I find no violation
of the 1999 Constitution within these sections,” the judge held.
Justice Olatoregun further held that NOSDRA’s demand letters
to Shell were not in conflict with Section 44 of the 1999 Constitution.
The judge said: “The plaintiff had notice and opportunity to
fair hearing. The plaintiff ought to have had recourse to the court for the
determination of its civil rights and a proper adjudication on the issues if it
felt its rights were infringed or about to be infringed.
“I do not find the two letters ultra vires the duties and
functions of the defendant.
“I have no reason to set both letters aside as well as the
sums ordered, as parties did not make evaluation of the assessed damage an
issue for consideration in the questions raised for determination. No evidence
upon which an evaluation could be made was also proffered.
“In the final analysis, all the questions raised by the
plaintiff are resolved in favour of the defendant. The only thing left to do is
make an order dismissing the suit. Same is dismissed.”
Comments
Post a Comment