Court dismisses forgery case against 3 traders
*Federal High Court in Lagos
(Nigeria) A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos on Tuesday, dismissed a four count-forgery charge filed by
the police against three traders, for lack of diligent prosecution.
The three traders: lkeaka Clement Chukwuebuka, 34, James
Obiechina Chekwube 39 and Oraeke Benjamin Onyeka, 32.
The three men were arraigned before Justice Mohammed Idris
by the policemen from State Criminal Intelligence and Investigation Department,
SCIID, Panti-Yaba, Lagos, on a four count-charge bordering on conspiracy and
forgery.
Police in the charge alleged that the three traders had
sometimes between 2015 and 2016, at Agric Market, Orile Coker, Lagos, conspired
among themselves and forged a trademark.
The police also alleged that the three traders falsely
applies a trademark code "lCLlCLlS" to their products such
"Ceramic tiles, doors, water closet and others so nearly resembled ”IDDIS”
a duly registered trade mark in China and Nigeria, belonging to one Mr. M.A.
Qian Li who is the owner and the proprietor of the said trade mark, so to be
calculated to deceive the unsuspected public.
The offences according to the prosecutor, Mr. Anyigor
Innocent, are contrary to sections 10, 3(b), and punishable under sections 3(3)(a)
of the Merchandise Marks Act. Cap. M10, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria,
2004.
The three freed men had pleaded not guilty to all the
charges when they were first arraigned before the court early last year, and
they were subsequently admitted to bail on different terms.
After their arraignment, the prosecution had failed to open
his case on three occasions.
At the resumed trial of the three men today, their lawyers,
Aso Kalu Etea and I've Asemudare, urged the court, to dismissed charge against
their clients, due to non-diligent prosecution.
In urging the court to dismiss the charge, both Etea and
Asemudara, told the court that for three occasions that the matter have been
slated for trial, the prosecutor had failed to show before the court.
Urging the court to dismiss the charge against the their
clients, their lawyer cited section 351 (1) of the Administration of Criminal
Justice Act, ACJA, 2015.
"The conduct of the prosecution, this is the third time
the matter is slated for trial, the prosecution is not ready. This is glaring that the prosecution is
lacking in prosecuting its case. Its against the law of speedy trial.
"In the circumstance, we hereby urged the court to
dismiss the charge against all the defendants".
After the submissions of the defendants' lawyers, Justice
Idris pronounced that the "charges against all the defendants is hereby
dismissed."
Comments
Post a Comment