Court fails to stop swearing in of Mahmoud as NBA president
(Nigeria) Efforts by the leading candidate in the just concluded Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, elections, Chief Joe-Kyari Gadzama, SAN, to stop the swearing in of the purported winner of the election, Mr. A.B. Mahmoud, SAN, at the on-going Annual General Conference in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, has suffered a temporary setback as an Abuja High Court was unable to hear the motion as all necessary parties to the suit were not served the with the processes and motion on notice filed by Gadzama.
Lead counsel to Gadzama,
who is the plaintiff in the matter Chief
Nnaemeka Ngige, SAN, announced his
appearance and informed the court that all the respondents in the matter had
been served with the processes including the motion on notice except the 13th defendant which is Grace Infotech Nigeria limited, owners of LawPavilion which locked its
Abuja office and therefore made it impossible to be served with the originating
processes in the suit.
Mr. Paul Erokoro, SAN, announced his appearance for the
15th respondent in the matter, Mr. Mahmoud,
and stated that he was just briefed on the matter yesterday night on the
telephone by his client who he has not
seen because the client is attending the
Annual General Conference of the NBA in Port Harcourt.
Erokoro said: “There is absolutely no way the motion can be
heard because the 13th defendant is fundamental to the
motion.”
After much argument among the counsel to both parties,
counsel to the plaintiff requested the court stood the matter down to allow
counsel conclude the process of filing an ex-parte motion for substituted
service on the 13th defendant and allow counsel to harmonise their positions on how to continue with the matter.
At resumed sitting, counsel to the plaintiff moved the
motion for substituted service on the 13th defendant, the motion was supported
by 14 paragraph Affidavit.
The motion was granted and the matter adjourned to September
8, to assess the parties' positions and go into the substance of the case.
Counsel to the plaintiff, urged Mr. Erokoro to give an
undertaking that the 15th defendant will not be sworn in tomorrow so that it
does not destroy the res. Mr. Erokoro
while refusing to give the
undertaking on the part of the defendants that the 15th defendant would
not be sworn in, accepted that the principles of lis pendens
should apply, so the fact of swearing in was not material as
the 15th defendant would relinquish the position if court subsequently finds that he was wrongly or improperly elected. .
The plaintiff was represented by Chief Nigige, SAN, Chief
Bolaji Ayorinde, SAN, Chief Pius Akubo, SAN, Sebastin Hon, SAN and a host
of other lawyers.
The 15th Defendant was represented by Chief Paul Erokoro,
SAN, S. I. Ameh, SAN and many other lawyers.
Comments
Post a Comment