Synagogue building: Witness disallowed from giving evidence
(Nigeria) The trial of two engineers charged with gross
negligence in the collapsed seven-storey guest house of the Synagogue Church of
All Nations, SCOAN, took a new twist on Monday as a prosecution witness, Mr
Adebayo Olayinka, was prevented from giving evidence.
Olayinka was prevented from giving evidence because his
witness statement was not frontloaded before the court by the prosecution.
Akinbela Fatiregun and Oladele Ogundeji alongside their
companies, Hardrock Construction and
Engineering Company and Jandy Trust Ltd and the trustees of SCOAN, are
facing a 111-count charge of gross negligence and criminal manslaughter.
The September 12,
2014 collapse of the guest house caused the death of 116 persons, 85 of whom
were South Africans.
Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the defence lawyer, who represented
the trustees of SCOAN while objecting said:"In the list of eight witnesses
being brought before the court by the state, only three witnesses have their
statements frontloaded.
"The statement of this witness was not frontloaded by
the prosecution and as a result, we cannot proceed with the witness because his
statement is not in the proof of evidence."
Mrs Idowu Alakija, the Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP,
however, objected to Fagbemi's submission.
She said:" The fact that the statement of a witness is
not in the proof of evidence does not preclude him from giving evidence as was
held in the case of Fashe vs the State. The statement of the witness here is as
an expert witness as is contained in Sections 183 and 197 of the Administration
of Criminal Justice Law."
Lawyer to Hardrock Construction and Engineering
Company, Mr E.L Akpofure, SAN, said frontloading
was needed to be done to ensure that the defence prepared adequately for
cross-examination.
"The prosecution should file additional proof of
evidence because we need to be abreast of the evidence the witness is going to
give to enable us prepare adequately for cross-examination. Your Lordship
should stall his testimony temporarily until additional proof of evidence is
filed by the DPP,'' Akpofure said.
Mrs Titi Akinlawon, SAN, lawyer to Fatiregun said the
information before the court should contain proof of evidence, the evidence
one should give.
"The prosecution has failed to comply with the
provisions of Section 251 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law."
Mr Olalekan Ojo, counsel to Ogundeji, in his submission,
added that "the substance of our objection
are that the defendants are to be tried on an incomplete information.
"According to Olowo v the state, no defendant should be
tried on an incomplete information."
In his ruling, Justice Lateef Lawal-Akapo obliged the
defence and ordered that the prosecution should frontload all their witnesses'
statement before the next date of adjournment.
The case was adjourned to June 1 and June 3 for continuation
of trial.
Comments
Post a Comment