Appeal Court dismisses Kanu’s bail appeal
(Nigeria) The Court of Appeal in Abuja has upheld the
decision of a Federal High Court, Abuja which refused Nnamdi Kanu, leader of
Indigenous People of Biafra, bail.
Kanu is being tried alongside two other pro-Biafra
agitators, Benjamin Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi, on charges of treasonable
felony, conspiracy and illegal arms possession.
The applicants had jointly approached the appellate court to
challenge the Jan. 29 ruling of the court denying them the bail.
In his judgment on Wednesdays, Justice Abdul Aboki,
alongside two other justices, held that the grievous nature of the charges and
dual citizenship status of Kanu influenced the court's decision.
``We have digested the processes brought before us to decide
this matter and having painstakingly assessed the two extreme submissions by
parties, the court is inclined to upholding the decision of the trial court.
``Our decision hinges on the grievous nature of the charges
brought against the applicants. It is even more challenging to grant Nnamdi
Kanu's prayer in the circumstance due to his dual citizenship status.
``As we have seen from the documentary evidence before us,
Kanu holds both Nigerian and British citizenship passports narrowing the
possibility of his standing justice if granted bail,’’ Aboki said.
Aboki further held that ``in the light of the above, the
appeal against the Jan. 29 decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja, by the
applicants is hereby dismissed.’’
The appellate court had reserved the judgment following the
adoption of addresses by the Prosecuting Counsel, Mr Mohammed Diri and Counsel
to the appellants, Chief Chuks Momah, SAN, on May 5.
In his address, Momah had told the court that the decision
of the trial court appeared as if it involved only the first appellant Kanu.
He, therefore, asked the court to allow the appeal and grant
his clients bail, adding that they were prepared to stand justice.
Momah said that the bail denial was inimical to the supposed
stance of the court to deliver justice to all involved in the case.
But, Diri had urged the court to uphold the ruling of the
trial court because the appeal lacked merit.
Diri said the trial would be aborted if the applicants were
given the luxury to go on bail.
He further argued that the activities of the applicants
constituted threat to national security.
The prosecution urged the court to take judicial notice of
the grievous punishment that the charges attracted.
Comments
Post a Comment