EFCC opposes Tarfa, SAN, bid to re-argue N2.5bn rights suit

By -
(Nigeria) Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Monday, opposed the move by Lagos lawyer, Mr Rickey Tarfa, SAN, seeking to re-open hearing in his N2.5billion fundamental rights suit and to advance further evidence.
Justice Mohammed Idris, who is hearing the matter was to have delivered judgment in the matter, on Monday, but Tarfa said the new evidence was not available at the time his case was argued.
Tarfe had sued EFCC, alongside its chairman, Mr Ibrahim Magu, Moses Awolusi, who arrested Tarfa, and Deputy Director Operations, EFCC, Lagos office, Iliyasu Kwarbai, for allegedly violating his rights after he was arrested for hiding two suspects, Nazaire Sorou Gnanhoue and Modeste Finagnon, both Beninoise, in his Mercedes Benz Sports Utility, thereby shielding them from arrest.
Tarfa in the N2.5billion suit, is praying the court to restrain the respondents and their agents from further violating his rights, and asked for N20 million as cost of the suit, among others.
Tarfa through his counsel, Mr Bolaji Ayorinde, SAN, who led five other SANs, including Oluyele Delano, Abiodun Owonikoko, Dr Muiz Banire, Sylva Ogwemoh and Uche Obi, as well 10  other lawyers, urged the court to allow the use of the further and better affidavit.
Ayorinde argued that the new affidavit was deposed to by a lawyer, Mohammed Awwal Yunusa, who swore that the bank account said to be owned by Justice Mohammed Yunusa, through which Tarfa allegedly paid the judge N225,000, belongs to the lawyer and not the judge.
He argued that the money contributed by some lawyers for Justice Yunusa when he was bereaved was different from the one EFCC alleged Tarfa paid into the judge's account.
Ayorinde said after admitting that a donation was made to the judge, Tarfa realised that N225,000 was actually given to a lawyer in his firm.
“This is a court of law, equity and justice. If, this (yesterday) morning, new information comes to us, we have to put it forward. The account they attribute to Justice Yunusa does not belong to him,” he said.
Ayorinde said “The evidence was not available as at the time we took the arguments. It behooves your Lordship to consider it,” he added.
EFCC, through its counsel, Wahab Shittu, opposed the application, arguing it was an after-thought designed to confuse issues and mislead the court.
He described Tarfa's claim as "blatant falsehood,” adding that "the facts cannot be twisted or misrepresented in any way whatsoever."
Shittu argued that the court having reserved judgment cannot entertain any fresh evidence at this stage of proceedings.
Shittu said Tarfa, in his extra-judicial statement to the commission, stated falsely that he was 43 when his real age is 54.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

UBTH @50: Obaseki hails institution’s role in strengthening Edo healthcare

By -
Image
(Nigeria) Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State, has commended the staff and management of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, UBTH, for their unwavering commitment, dedication, and hard work in providing high-quality healthcare services to the people of Edo State and Nigeria in the past fifty years. Obaseki, at a dinner organized in honour of the Committee of Chief Medical Directors of Nigeria, at the Government House, Benin City, reassured the government’s continuous partnership and collaboration with the federal government-owned health institution to strengthen the health system and ensure quality health delivery to Edo people. The governor, who was represented by his deputy, Philip Shaibu, reeled out the gains of the government’s reforms in the health sector, commending the medical centre for bolstering the government’s efforts at transforming Edo State into a health hub. He said, "We came into a wilderness where you have to cut a part for yourself and fix it. We held
Read more

NBC has no powers to impose fine on broadcast stations --Court

By -
Image
(Nigeria) The National Broadcasting Commission, NBC, has been restrained by a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, from imposing fines on broadcast stations in the country. Trial judge in the matter, Justice James Omotosho also set aside the N500,000 fines imposed on March 1, 2019, on each of 45 broadcast stations. The court made the orders in its judgment a suit by the Incorporated Trustees of Media Rights Agenda, MRA, which had sued the NBC. Justice Omotosho held that the NBC, not being a court of law, had no power to impose sanctions as punishment on broadcast stations. The court further held that the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, which gives the commission the power to impose sanction, is in conflict with Section 6 of the Constitution that vested judicial power in the court of law. He said the court would not sit idle and watch a body imposing fine arbitrarily without recourse to the law. He said that the commission did not comply with the law when it sat as a complainant and at
Read more