Court frees Wale Babalakin, 4 others

By -
(Nigeria) Justice Lateef Lawal-Akapo of a Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja on Monday, discharged the Chairman of Bi-Courtney Limited, Dr. Wale Babalakin, SAN, and four others of an alleged N4.7billion fraud preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
Ruling on the application for quash filed by Babalakin and his co-defendants, the trial judge formulated four issues raised by the defendants to determine his ruling.
According to him, the issues are: Whether the EFCC can prosecute a defendant without fiat; whether former Delta State Governor, James Onanefe Ibori, is a public officer; whether two prosecuting authorities can jointly sign a charge, and whether the charge on the surface contains sufficient information.
Justice Lawal-Akapo, however, resolved three of the issues in favour of the defendants and only upheld that the EFCC had the power to prosecute any criminal matter in court without fiat.
The EFCC had charged Babalakin and his companies, Stabilini Visinoni Limited and Bi-Courtney Limited, as well as Alex Okoh and his company, Renix Nigeria Limited, to court on a 27-count bordering on conspiracy, retention of proceeds of criminal conduct and corruptly conferring benefit on account of public action.
The anti-graft agency had alleged that Babalakin and his co-defendants fraudulently assisted convicted former Delta State governor, James Ibori, to transfer huge sums of money through various parties to Erin Aviation account in Mauritius for the purchase of a plane.
But, the defendants through their counsel filed separate applications, praying Justice Lawal-Akapo to quash the charges, with a submission that the EFCC, as a federal agency, lacked valid fiat to prosecute them in a State High Court.
The defendants through their counsel, Dr. Biodun Layonu (SAN), Mr. Tayo Oyetibo (SAN), Mr. Roland Otaru (SAN), Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN) and Mr. Oladapo Akinosun, also argued that the State High Court has no jurisdiction to hear offences brought under the EFCC Act.
The lawyers posited that all the charges against the defendants were predicated on repealed laws of Lagos State and urged the court to quash same.
They also submitted that the defendants were not properly informed of the details of the offences they were charged for, as stated in the Constitution, adding that Counts 2 to 13 neither informed the defendants the details of the offences, nor did they constitute an offence under any written law in the country.
However, the EFCC through its counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), while opposing the applications of the defendants, had told the court that the agency has the constitutional right to prosecute them before a State High Court.
Jacob also contended that Section 286 of the Constitution permits a State High Court to entertain federal offences.
On the issue of general fiat issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, Jacob said the only person who can complain about not getting the said fiat is the Lagos State Attorney-General himself and not any of the parties before the court.
The EFCC counsel said both the EFCC and the AGF are authorised by law to initiate criminal proceedings, adding that the fact that both bodies jointly initiated the charges against the defendants does not make it illegal.
In his ruling, Justice Lawal-Akapo upheld the argument of counsel to the defendants that the EFCC had not disclosed enough information to sustain the allegations made against Babalakin and his co-defendants.
The judge held that the EFCC, for instance, did not disclose the particulars of the offences allegedly committed and when the offences took place, among others, adding: "The amended information filed on May 7, 2013 is incurably bad and ineffective."
The judge also held that Ibori, who was alleged to have corruptly conferred the N4.7billion on Babalakin, is not a public officer as stated in the charge.
On the issue of prosecuting authorities jointly signing a charge, the judge agreed with the defendants that the trial was a joint prosecution between the EFCC and the AGF.
Consequently, Justice Lawal-Akapo discharged Babalakin and his co-defendants and struck out the matter, which began in 2012 before Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo, who was later transferred out of the criminal division of the Lagos High Court.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

UBTH @50: Obaseki hails institution’s role in strengthening Edo healthcare

By -
Image
(Nigeria) Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State, has commended the staff and management of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, UBTH, for their unwavering commitment, dedication, and hard work in providing high-quality healthcare services to the people of Edo State and Nigeria in the past fifty years. Obaseki, at a dinner organized in honour of the Committee of Chief Medical Directors of Nigeria, at the Government House, Benin City, reassured the government’s continuous partnership and collaboration with the federal government-owned health institution to strengthen the health system and ensure quality health delivery to Edo people. The governor, who was represented by his deputy, Philip Shaibu, reeled out the gains of the government’s reforms in the health sector, commending the medical centre for bolstering the government’s efforts at transforming Edo State into a health hub. He said, "We came into a wilderness where you have to cut a part for yourself and fix it. We held...
Read more

Fines on broadcast stations: NGE salutes court over perpetual order against NBC

By -
Image
(Nigeria) The Nigerian Guild of Editors, NGE, has commended the Federal High Court Abuja, over its order of perpetual injunctions restraining the National Broadcasting Commission, NBC, from imposing fines on broadcast stations in the country. Ruling on originating motions marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1386/2021, instituted by the Incorporated Trustees of Media Rights Agenda against the NBC - as sole respondent in the suit, Justice James Omotosho, also set aside the N500, 000 fines imposed on March 1, 2019, on each of 45 broadcast stations. The judge also held that the NBC, not being a court of law, had no power to impose sanctions as punishment on broadcast stations. He further held that the Nigeria Broadcast Code, which gives the commission the power to impose sanction, is in conflict with Section 6 of the Constitution that vested judicial power in the court of law. In a statement by its President, Mustapha Isah and the General Secretary, Dr. Iyobosa Uwugiaren, on Wednesday, the Guild salut...
Read more

Osun: S'Court ruling affirmed power resides with the people - Diri

By -
Image
*Bayelsa State Governor, Senator Douye Diri (Nigeria) Bayelsa State Governor, Senator Douye Diri, has said the ruling of the country’s apex court on the Osun State governorship election was an affirmation that power in a democracy resided with the people. Governor Diri, while congratulating Senator Ademola Adeleke in a statement issued by his Chief Press Secretary, Daniel Alabrah, on Wednesday, expressed joy that the Supreme Court sealed the mandate freely given to the governor by the Osun people. The Bayelsa governor also said the verdict reflected the current mood of the country where those whose stock-in-trade is to promote electoral violence and subvert the will of the people have no place in our electoral system. He expressed the hope that introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System, BVAS, will instil more confidence in the electoral process, urging the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to deepen Nigeria’s democracy by also introducing electronic votin...
Read more