Nyanya bomb blast: Court throws out charges against Ogwuche
(Nigeria )
An Abuja Federal High Court on Monday struck out the terrorism charges against
Aminu Ogwuche, the alleged mastermind of the April 14 Nyanya bus station bomb
explosion that killed 75 persons.
Delivering a ruling on the case, the trial judge, Justice
Adeniyi Ademola, struck out the two-count criminal charge filed against the
accused for lack of diligent prosecution by the Police.
The alleged offences are punishable under sections 1 (2) (d)
and 17 of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act of 2013.
The judge said: “This criminal charge against the accused is
hereby struck out for want of diligent prosecution by the complainant, that is,
the Inspector-General of Police and prosecutor.”
Justice Ademola also ordered the Department of State
Security, DSS to keep Ogwuche in its custody and produce him in court on December
5 for hearing in his bail application filed by his counsel.
He ordered that Ogwuche should have access to three counsels
of his choice, his wife, brother and be given medical attention while in DSS
custody.
Ademola also ordered that the accused should be treated at
the National Hospital , whenever necessary.
Ogwuche’s had submitted in the bail application, that
Ogwuche, 29, did not know anything about the charges and, therefore, should be
released to further his education, if nothing was found against him.
Ogwuche was alleged to have conspired with others at large
to detonate Improvised Explosive Device (IED) at Nyanya bus station, Abuja , on April 14,
killing no fewer than 75 persons.
He was subsequently arrested in Sudan ,
where he allegedly escaped to, after masterminding the attack and extradited to
Nigeria
for prosecution.
However, his planned arraignment was stalled since his
arrest on July 15, as the SSS and Police failed to agree on which of them
should be allowed to conduct the trial.
The judge had on September 26, given the security agencies
90 days within which to go and sort out themselves in order to expedite the
arraignment and trial.
Later, the DSS, which took custody of the accused,
approached the court for an order to permit it to retain him in detention until
the conclusion of investigations into the matter.
Comments
Post a Comment