SERAP drags FG to UN body over failure to meet the demands of university teachers
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, has dragged the government of President Goodluck Jonathan before the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights over “a serious breach of the
obligations by Nigeria under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights to progressively realize the right to education in accordance
with the country’s maximum available resources.”
The group said that, “This fundamental breach is
due primarily to the persistent refusal by the government to honor the
agreement with members of the Academic Staff Union of
Universities, ASUU.”
In
the petition by SERAP's Executive Director, Mr Adetokunbo Mumuni, the group said that “Although the
government in 2009 agreed with ASUU to improve the governance structures and funding
for the operation of universities across the country to around 26 percent for the
period covering 2009-2020, the terms of the agreement have remained largely
unfulfilled. Conditions of service for staff members of the country’s
universities remain very poor. Further the right of the students to freedom of
assembly and association is not fully and effectively respected by the
authorities.”
The petition sent to the committee through the Office
of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ms Navi Pillay, also stated that, “under
international law, Nigeria is required to demonstrate that, in aggregate, the
measures being taken are sufficient to realize the right to education for Nigerian
children in the shortest possible time using the maximum available resources.
“However, the continuing refusal by the government to honour
agreements with ASUU constitutes a fundamental breach of these obligations, and
shows lack of good faith by the government to implement its voluntary
international commitments.
“One of the
best financial investments States can make is education but the Nigerian government’s
investment on education for many years has been only a drop in the ocean especially
when measured in the light of the country’s accrued revenue from oil, and its
maximum available resources. No wonder, then, that the government has
persistently failed to improve the infrastructural and academic environment at
all levels of education in the country.”
“This situation is inconsistent with the letter and
spirit of the Covenant as well as the Committee’s own jurisprudence,” the group
also argued.
The group called on the Committee to “demand that
the Nigerian government should urgently and fully implement its agreement with
ASUU, and ensure sufficient funding of universities across the country. The
Committee should put pressure on the government to promote, protect and fulfil
the right to education for the sake of millions of Nigerian children that
continue to be denied this fundamental human right.
"Education is
not only a human right in itself but also an indispensable means of realizing
other human rights. It is the primary vehicle by which economically and
socially marginalized adults and children can lift themselves out of poverty
and obtain the means to participate fully in their communities. Education also has
a vital role in empowering women, safeguarding children from exploitative and
hazardous labour and sexual exploitation, promoting human rights and democracy,
and protecting the environment.
“As the Committee has stated, states must take
deliberate, concrete and targeted steps as clearly as possible towards meeting
the obligations recognized in the Covenant. But the persistent refusal by the
government to sufficiently fund the country’s universities, and honor its own
agreement to ASUU is a deliberate retrogressive measure, and shows lack of good
faith.
“Although states are given
a margin of discretion’ in the assessment of what resources are available, they
nonetheless must utilise the maximum available resources to achieve the full
realization of the right to education. SERAP contends that the refusal by the
government to sufficiently fund the universities in accordance with its maximum
available resources cannot be justified on any ground whatsoever.”
Comments
Post a Comment