Election reporting: SERAP asks Buhari to withdraw threat to shut down broadcast stations
(Nigeria) Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, has urged President Muhammadu Buhari to “instruct Mr Lai Mohammed, Minister of Information and Culture, and the National Broadcasting Commission, NBC, to urgently withdraw the ‘last warning’ and threat to revoke the licenses of broadcast stations and shut them down over their coverage of elections and post-election matters.”
The NBC had last week threatened to revoke
the licenses of broadcast stations and shut them down “if they continue to
allow unpatriotic individuals on their platforms to make utterances that are
subversive, hateful, and inciting, and negative conversations particularly in
the post-2023 Presidential Election.”
But in a letter dated March 11, 2023, by SERAP deputy director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the organization said, “The ‘last warning’ and threat by the NBC if not immediately withdrawn would limit freedom of expression and the ability of broadcast stations to cover important issues around the 2023 general elections.”
*According to SERAP, “Threatening to shut
down and revoke the licences of broadcast stations simply for carrying out
their ‘watchdog role’ is clearly incompatible with Nigeria’s constitutional and
international human rights obligations.”
The letter, read in part: “Political
expression is a fundamental right. The threat by the NBC creates a significant
risk that legitimate expression may be prohibited.
“Such unlawful prohibition may prevent
transparency and dissemination of information on legitimate issues of public
interest around the 2023 general elections.
“We would be grateful if the requested
action is taken within 48 hours of the receipt and/or publication of this
letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate
legal actions to compel your government to comply with our request in the
public interest.
“The threat may produce a direct impact on
the work of broadcast stations in ways that are inconsistent with the right to
freedom of expression, access to information and media freedom.
“Your government has a legal responsibility
to ensure an environment in which a diverse range of political opinions and
ideas around the general elections can be freely and openly expressed and
debated.
“The threat by the NBC is neither necessary
nor proportionate, as it would unduly intrude upon Nigerians’ right to freedom
of expression, access to information, and media freedom.
“The use of vague and undefined phrases
such as ‘unpatriotic individuals’ ‘subversive, hateful, and inciting
utterances, particularly post-election’, as grounds to threaten to shut down
broadcast stations is inconsistent and incompatible with human rights
requirements.
“The Nigerian Constitution and human rights
treaties impose legal obligations on your government to refrain from imposing
restrictions which are not consistent with human rights requirements, including
on discussion of political and election-related issues.
“It is also inconsistent with
constitutional and international human rights requirements to threaten
broadcast stations solely for their coverage of the issues around the general
elections on the basis of vague phrases such as ‘unguarded statements, divisive
and dangerous comments’, ‘negative conversations’ used by the NBC.
“The threat may stifle reporting on
political and election-related issues, as well as have a deterrent effect on
the public’s exercise of their right to freedom of expression on political and
election-related issues, in particular issues deemed controversial or critical.
“The threat also represents a serious
hindrance to the exercise of journalism, media diversity and media freedom, and
participation.
“This kind of threat to journalism has
furthermore serious implications on the public’s right to information, in
particular in the context of the general elections where the role of the media
is of particular importance.
“SERAP notes that Section 39(1) of the
Nigerian Constitution 1999 (as amended), Article 9 of the African Charter on
Human and Peoples’ Rights and article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, to which Nigeria is a state party protect everyone’s
right to maintain an opinion without interference and to seek, receive and
impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers.
“Under the Constitution and these human
rights treaties, restrictions on the right to freedom of expression must be
‘provided by law’, and necessary for ‘the rights or reputations of others’ or
‘for the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or
of public health and morals’.
“Similarly, the Nigerian Constitution and
human rights treaties provide for the rights of individuals to be protected,
inter alia, against unlawful or arbitrary interference, and provide that
everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference.
“‘Unlawful’ means that no interference may
take place except in cases envisaged by the law which in itself must comply
with the requirements of human rights and the rule of law.
“Media coverage of the general elections
and post-election matters, and media freedom are closely connected, as access
to information is an essential requirement for the realization of the rights to
freedom of expression and participation.
“Similarly, phrases such as ‘unguarded
statements, divisive and dangerous comments’, ‘negative conversations’ used by
the NBC lack sufficient clarity and can be arbitrarily or discriminatorily
applied and enforced.
“The ‘last warning’ and threat by the NBC
would seem not to meet the strict requirements of the Nigerian Constitution and
the country’s international human rights obligations. In particular, it is unclear the scope or
object of what these wordings seek to prohibit.
“Under the constitutional and international
requirement of legality, it is not enough that restrictions on freedom of
expression, access to information and media freedom are formally stated in
press releases and regulations.
“The NBC legislation and codes do not
confer unfettered discretion for the restriction of freedom of expression on
those charged with their implementation.
“The requirement of legality also serves to
define the scope of legal discretion conferred on implementing authorities in
order to provide adequate protection against arbitrary implementation.
“General prohibitions on the dissemination
of information based on vague and ambiguous ideas, including ‘unguarded
statements, divisive and dangerous comments’, ‘negative conversations’ are
incompatible with legal requirements and should be immediately withdrawn.
“According to our information, Mall.
Balarabe Ilelah, Director-General of the National Broadcasting Commission, NBC, on March 7, 2023, reportedly
made the NBC’s ‘last warning to broadcast stations’. The NBC ‘will not hesitate
to shut down any station or revoke its licence once it is convinced that the
activities of the station is capable of undermining the peaceful co-existence
of the country.’”
Comments
Post a Comment