World Bank to decide on SERAP's appeal on Abacha loot spending
(Nigeria) World Bank Access to Information Committee has
asked for more time to reach a decision on the appeal lodged with it by
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, regarding spending of
recovered stolen funds by the late Head of State, General Sani Abacha.
The letter addressed to Olukayode Majekodunmi, SERAP’s Deputy
Director and received by the organisation on Wednesday, reads in part: “In
response to your appeal under Case Number AI3982-A, this is to inform you that
your appeal remains under consideration by the Access to Information Committee
in accordance with the World Bank’s Access to Information Policy.
“The Access to Information Committee makes its best efforts
to reach a decision on appeals within 45 working days of receiving an appeal.
In this case, the Access to Information Committee needs additional time to
reach a decision. We appreciate your patience while the Access to Information
Committee considers your appeal.”
It will be recalled that SERAP in the appeal dated 5
February 2016 said that it considered the decision not to reveal important
portions of the information requested on how Abacha loot was spent “a serious
violation of the AI Policy, as it amounts to improper or unreasonable
restriction of access to information.”
The organisation said, “Following receipt of several
documents from the World Bank totalling over 700 pages on the Abacha loot,
SERAP commenced independent investigations and verification of some of the
information supplied with appropriate agencies and institutions of government.”
The appeal reads in part: “SERAP is concerned that the World
Bank failed and/or neglected to provide several portions of the information
requested on the spending of recovered Abacha loot managed by the Bank.
“SERAP notes that one of the guiding principles of the
Policy on Access to Information (AI Policy) is recognizing the right to an
appeals process when a request for information in the World Bank's possession
is improperly or unreasonably denied.
“SERAP argues that there is a strong public interest case
here to override the corporate administrative matters, deliberative information
or financial information exceptions of the AI Policy if the information being
requested falls under one of these exceptions.
“SERAP believes that it is not harmful for the Bank to
disclose specific details of the information requested. SERAP also notes that
the sole remedy available to those who prevail in the appeals process is to
receive the information requested.”
SERAP therefore, requested the Access to Information, AI,
Appeals Board to exercise its prerogative and allow disclosure of the following
specific information and any feedback from the World Bank Evaluation Team on
the issues below: Evidence and list of the 23 projects allegedly completed with
recovered Abacha loot, and whether the 26 projects where actually completed;
and what became of the two abandoned projects; Evidence and location of the eight8 health
centres built with recovered Abacha loot reviewed by the World Bank; Evidence and
location of the 18 power projects confirmed by the World Bank.
“How the $50mn Abacha loot received before 2005 kept in the
special account was spent; Evidence and location of schools which benefited
from the Universal Basic Education (UBE) program in the amount of NGN24.25bn;
and Evidence and location of the 13 road projects completed with the recovered
Abacha loot, including the names of the three of the largest road and bridge
projects in each geo-political zone
Comments
Post a Comment